Canada Halts Extermination Program for the Mentally-ill Until After the Election
Monday, February 5, 2024
Friday, July 14, 2023
Cluster Bombs: The Ideal Weapon for Ukraine's Genocidal War with Russia
For some reason Canada and the UK are expressing concern over Long-Gone Biden's decision to provide Ukraine with cluster bombs -- old unreliable stuff -- for use in its war on Ukraine's ethnic Russian population.
Trudeau in Nazi Azov uniform |
Cluster bomblets that remain lethal for days, months and years after delivery and are likely to be found and picked up by children with often lethal consequences, make for the ideal genocidal weapon.
And it is a war of genocide. The Jew Zelensky's government in Keeve sent Nazis to Eastern Ukraine to kill those bastard Donbas Russians. Since the intended occupation of Donbas and massacre failed to occur as planned, littering the ground of the Donbas with explosive bomblets is clearly the next best option.
But being faux liberals, Canada's Trudeau and Britain's Hindu premier, seek to camauflage their support for Nazism in Ukraine by expressing faux horror at the use of munitions that kill kids.Saturday, March 26, 2022
Ukraine Does Not Have a Nazi Problem, It Has a Russian Problem
Ukraine's problem is not Nazis but Russians. Ukraine's Nazis hate Russians for the same reason that Germany's Nazis hated Jews, and Zionist Jews hate Arabs: they hate the presence in their society of people of alien race, religion and culture.
And for Ukrainians the problem with Russians, not only their presence but also their frequent domination, has existed intermittently for over a thousand years. The first Russians in what is now the Ukraine were Vikings. These were people from Finland and other places to the North, who traversed Eastern Europe in light wooden boats that they portaged from river to river. In this, way Russians crossed the Eurasian continent from the Baltic to the Black sea, the final leg of their journey via the Dniepr River. It was on the banks of the Dniepr that they established, at a place called Kiev, the capital of the Russian state.
From the mouth of the Dniepr, the early Russian adventurers sailed the Black Sea to the Dardanelles, bringing honey, wax, fur and slaves from the forests of the North to exchange for cloth, porcelain, ironware, gold and silver in the markets of the Roman capital of Constantinople.
Over the course of time, the Ukrainian portion of the Russian domain was overrun by other groups including the Kazars, who converted to Judaism (hence the blonde blue-eyed Jews of the Ukraine), and the Tatars, a branch of Gengis Kahn's Golden Horde. But the Russians returned, first to the territory East of the Dniepr, which they acquired at the expense of the Polish-Lithuanian Empire in 1667. Subsequently Russia gained control of territory to the West of Dniepr through an agreement with the Cossacks. Then, in 1783, they conquered Crimea whence Tatars had made a practice of invading Southern Russia to kidnap tens of thousands of peasants each year to sell in the slave market at Constantinople.
Thus, prior to the Russian Revolution, the Russian Tsar ruled the three Russias: Great Russia, which was more or less coextensive with Russia today, including Crimea, White Russia, now an independent Belarus, and Little Russia, aka the Ukraine.
Following the Russian Revolution, the Ukraine became independent, experienced a civil war, after which it was conquered by the Soviet Union, becoming independent once again following the collapse of the Soviet Union.
In light of that history, the ambivalence of feeling of Russians and Ukrainians for one another is understandable. However, since the break-up of the Soviet Union, the Ukrainians foolishly antagonized Russia and Ukraine's ethnic Russian population by threatening a genocide of ethnic Russians comprising a majority of the population of the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine: an antagonism leading to the formation of the breakaway republics of Donetsk and Luhansk.
Separation, however, was not acceptable to the Ukrainian nationalists who wish to possess an Eastern Ukraine minus ethnic Russians. Thus, as former Ukrainian Prime Minister Julia Tymoshenko avowed, the Donbas Russians, or cockroaches as the Ukrainian Nazis contend, should be nuked, or as other more humane Kievites contend, expelled from the territory of the Ukraine. Pending any other solution, the Ukrainians have shelled and sniped at the people of Donetsk and Luhansk, killing, so it is reported, around 15,000 of them, including hundreds of children.
Most recently, according to US Colonel Douglas McGregor, Ukraine assembled in Eastern Ukraine an army of 60,000, including the notorious Nazi Azov Battalion, with the apparent intention of wiping out the breakaway republics. This action compelled a response from Moscow, which culminated in the current invasion.
How the conflict will be resolved remains to be seen, but the obvious, humane solution would be a region by region referendum to determine how the people in each part of the Ukraine wish to be governed. Do they want inclusion within the Ukrainian state -- with its avowed intention to eliminate Russian culture and the use of the Russian language for all official purposes including education; independence as separate states; or union with one of the states adjacent to the Ukraine, these being Romania, Hungary, Slovakia, Poland, Belarus, and Russia.
A referendum in Crimea in 2014 which indicated overwhelming popular support for union with Russia, was followed by an essentially peaceful Russian annexation. However, no such decent solution to ethnic division in the remaining Russian-dominated regions of the Ukraine is acceptable to the Ukrainian leadership in Kiev. Furthermore, any such democratic solution, which would almost certainly result in further territory being annexed by Russia, would certainly be condemned by the self-declared global hegemon, the United States of Aggression and the leaders of America's NATO side kicks, including Bojo the Concuspicient, Trudeau the Maple Leaf Fuhrer, plus the zero Covid crackpots of Australasia.
Related:
Colonel Douglas Macgregor: The US is Deliberately Ignoring the Path to Peace in UkraineUkraine War! What Is It Good For? The Global Reset
Saturday, July 10, 2021
Death of A Nation: Canada, Mass Immigration and a Falling Birth Rate
Maxime Bernier, has served in Canada's government as Minister of state for small business, Minister of Foreign Affairs, and Chair of the National Defense Select Committee.
To destroy one's own cultural heritage indeed seems monstrous. But there is another consequence of mass immigration that that seems even more monstrous.
Furthermore, the influx of migrants is the chief cause of Canada's continued low fertility rate.
Mass immigration drives:
* competition for, and hence the cost of, housing;
* demand for, and hence the cost in taxes of, infrastructure such as schools and hospitals;
* competition for jobs, thus lowering wages.
By lowering incomes and raising the cost of buying a home, mass immigration thus delays family formation, which in turn, suppresses the fertility rate thereby keeping the historic Canadian nation on track for extinction.
Saturday, April 24, 2021
Is This the End of the Road?
Apparently, I am unable to comment on my own blog.
When attempting to respond to a comment on the previous post I get a blank face icon.
But it seems I can still create a new post -- or can I?
Let's see.
If I can, here's a response to a comment concerning immigration from "Unknown" on the previous post:
As for population, the policy of Canada and other Western nations is evidently to drive the fertility of the native population well below replacement by the promotion of abortion, pornography, and easy divorce, while indoctrinating the young with the belief that the only sexual vice is reproduction.
The reproductive deficit is then being more than made up for by mass immigration from high fertility nations, particularly of the Indian subcontinent and sub-Saharan Africa, which further suppresses native fertility through intensified competition for educational opportunities, jobs, and housing.
This can only be explained as a deliberate policy of national genocide, opposition to which is viciously punished as racism.
As for Covid, God only knows what that's about and even God may not know. But what we do know is that the response has been grotesquely inappropriate to the magnitude of the threat that Covid represents.
In particular, we now know that 78% of Covid hospitalizations in the US have been of people either overweight or obese. As the vast majority of Covid deaths have been of the very old and frail, we can assume that virtually all of the remaining 22% of US Covid hospitalizations were among the very old and frail.
Therefore, it is clear that the only appropriate governmental response to Covid would have been to advise the overweight and the old to take care until the epidemic has passed and, in particular, avoid contact with the young and socially active who are the main vectors of the disease. If necessary, government could have given financial or other assistance to those deeming it necessary to self-isolate for their own protection.
As for the insanely over-the-top Covid response of most Western governments, the only morally justifiable reason we can think of is that it has been a trial of the response to an outbreak of biological warfare. But we invite other suggestions.
But better late than never. Here's a Covid Policy proposal for immediate government adoption:
AIER: 14 Months Later: A Pathway ForwardVaccine Passport Protest: London England:
Sunday, June 7, 2020
Churchill Was a Racist for Good and Obvious Reasons
The man who defeated the Nazis is a Nazi now? |
Churchill understood that if allowed to enter Europe in large numbers the alien settler, whether Muslim, Sikh, Hindu or Confucian, would seek to establish their race, their culture, their religion in place of the native peoples of Europe, their culture and their religion.
Hence, naturally, the hatred of Churchill by the immigrants that depraved or insane politicians and their demented white supporters have allowed to enter Europe's narrow borders in numbers that cannot possibly be assimilated to the native nations of Europe.
Systemic racism is the basis of every nation state. Try insisting otherwise to the Chinese, the Indians, the South Africans, or the people of any other country you care to name, and see how quickly they invite in the teaming masses from the slums of London or Glasgow, New York or Chicago.
Anti-racism is the ideology of the globalists: smash the nation state and the money power will exercise control through the corrupt global and multi-national institutions such as the UN, the WHO, NATO, the EU, and dozens of others.
In Canada, systemic racism is the very basis of the state. The stability and unity of the Canadian confederation, a creation of the British-born Sir John A. MacDonald, depends on the acquiescence of the four-hundred-year-old French colony of Quebec. Hence, respect the nation, i.e., the institutions, the language and the traditions of the French nation in North America, was the mantra of Canada's founding fathers.
Likewise, Canada's relations with the indigenous peoples, Indian and Innuit, depends on respect for these so-called first nations, their racial integrity as reflected in their right to control who may live on native land, and their right to their own institutions of government.
Without systemic racism, no nation can stand. Anti-racists are dupes or agents of a globalist conspiracy to destroy the European nations: a conspiracy for the genocide of the European peoples as both racial and cultural entities.
ZH: Anonymous Berkeley Professor Shreds BLM Injustice Narrative
Patrick Buchanan: Will Churchill’s Statue Be Next to Fall?
AmConMag:What Is ‘Systemic Racism,’ Really?
The underlying essence of the narrative is an increasingly brutal and incendiary polemical assault on a demographic segment of the nation–white people. They are guilty, it is said with increasing aggressiveness, for the sins of their forebears, for the racism of the past. And they must confess their guilt and seek absolution through self-abasement. Read more |
Gilad Atzmon: Weimar 2020
Maverick Philosopher: 'Systemic Racism' is a Vicious, Hate-America, Leftist Myth
HideOutNow: Black Lives Matter ‘What We Believe’ Page: ‘Disrupt The Western-Prescribed Nuclear Family,’ ‘Dismantle Cisgender Privilege’
ZH: BLM Protesters Vandalize Abraham Lincoln Statue In London
Tuesday, February 11, 2020
Feminists for Global Genocide, No. 79
What's particularly annoying about this ugly, immigrant alleged scholar and feminist traitor is that she won't set an example to those she seeks to lead by offing herself.
And what's totally bizarre is why the Brits allow such vile people as Patricia MacCormack to indoctrinate their children.
Related:
CanSpeccy: Democracy, Shamocracy and the Death of the West
Monday, January 20, 2020
Mass Immigration Is Bad for Britain (and Every Other Nation of European People)
This guy is suave, but he won't say that when you have a below replacement fertility rate and you allow millions of immigrants to compete with your own people for jobs and housing, you are engaged in genocide and population replacement.
Raphael Lemkin, who coined the term genocide, said of the term that it may refer simply to:
a coordinated plan aimed at destruction of the essential foundations of the life of national groups so that these groups wither and die like plants that have suffered a blight.Such is precisely the fate of the English in their own capital city, of London, where in many boroughs the English are not even the largest minority.
Savile Town, England where only 48 of 4,033 residents are white, native British. Source. |
Related:
The 'Great Replacement' In Switzerland
A recent study by the Federal Office of Statistics showed the over-representation of certain nationalities among welfare recipients. Thus at the end 2017, 83% of Somalians and 54% of Eritreans and Congolese living in Switzerland are on welfare. More generally, of the 350,000 beneficiaries of social assistance, 57% are foreigners.
A study by the Zurich university of sciences came to the conclusion that 21% of young Muslims living in Switzerland consider that sharia law is superior to Swiss law.
... a Swiss central Islamic committee has been established with some 3,500 members. The organization has been accused of encouraging its members to engage in polygamy and female genital mutilation. Its members are also being sued for supporting Al Qaeda.
.... According the Pew Research Center, around 6% of the population is Muslim, around 400,000 people. According to Pew’s forecasts, the Muslim population could in 2050 make up between 8% and 12% of the Swiss population.
... the vote against mass immigration did not lead to new rules for the movement of people between Switzerland and the European Union, because of the gridlock of the EU institutions.
And:
French Intellectual Sentenced To 2 Months Jail After Calling Mass Immigration An "Invasion"
The corner of Yorkshire colonized by Muslim settlers
Sweden Terrorized By Immigrant Bombers and Rapists
Understanding the Fabian Window
George Orwell: Wells, Hitler And The World State
Wednesday, January 1, 2020
Free Speech in the Age of Political Correctness
However, based on his scholarly treatise, The Culture of Critique, it would seem reasonable to suppose that MacDonald is not some racist nut, but a rational scholar examining the way in which diaspora Jews often interact with the people of their host nation.
Whether MacDonald's analysis is generally sound it is not my purpose here to consider, although having dipped into his major treatise, I can say that it proceeds in accordance with the normal methods of rational academic discourse and confirms much of what is apparent to the casual observer concerning Jewish beliefs, traditions, and modes of behavior.
It is naturally painful, therefore, for a person such as MacDonald to find themselves generally ostracized for their sincerely held and carefully weighed opinions on a subject to which they have devoted lengthy study.
Reflecting the painful social consequences of his academic pursuits, MacDonald recently published an article entitled: Ideas on maintaining relationships with the less committed in a dark age, wherein he states:
... Many of us are forced to deal with personal issues because of our political-cultural beliefs. A typical situation might be a wife or girlfriend—the great majority of activists on the dissident right are male—who is terrified of it becoming known that she is associated with someone who is shunned and socially ostracized. But of course, it may also be other family members or friends—a particularly painful experience. ... |
... This is comedy gold.
First, that people believe that we still have freedom of speech. ...
|
In fact, Americans do still have the constitutional right of free speech. However, freedom of speech is a legal freedom, whereas freedom of action, whether in the form of speech or otherwise, is subject to both legal and social limitations.
Political correctness diminishes or eradicates the value of the legal right of free speech by imposing social control over speech, i.e., informal sanctions imposed by friends and family, or economic sanctions imposed by employers, state bureaucracies, political parties, etc.
The pervasive and uniformly PC impact of media, the propaganda dispensed by state-managed educational institutions, and the Google-style economic punishment of the expression of non-PC beliefs, ensures that the exercise of Freedom of Speech is a rare and often painful experience.
The result is a massive build up of resentment among the socially oppressed until something gives. In the UK, the working class, comprehensively betrayed by Phony Bliar's PC "New Labour" party --which deliberately flooded the working class areas of declining industrial towns with immigrants of an alien race, religion and culture, has defected in large numbers to a supposedly populist Johnson Tory Party.
The consequence of this reaction remains to be seen. But if the Johnson Government fails to deliver for Britain's working class the consequences may be be ugly in the extreme.
Meantime, the liberal left are turning up the invective against the working man. Hence the headline in that most disgusting of all self-hating white liberal newspapers, The Independent:
The antisemitic monster rising from the slime is not Corbynism – it is white nationalism
There you have the resort to hate speech direct in the cause of British national genocide through suppressed reproduction and mass replacement immigration.
The outcome? Civil War, anyone? Most Americans think it likely. Why should it not be likely in Britain too, where another civil war seems overdue.
Related: Joe Digenova: American coup d'etat:
Monday, December 2, 2019
Greta Thunberg, the Media and White Self-Genocide
What Greta Thunberg is saying, namely, that it will be her generation and its successors that will suffer the most severe consequences of this approaching disaster, a disaster brought by the actions of older generations is, therefore, entirely logical and as valid as all the fear-mongering about climate change.
Moreover, not only is Greta Thunberg's message entirely reasonable, it is highly effective for the simple reason that, when not contorted by anger or fear, Greta has a pretty face: a pretty face that should remind us of another ongoing disaster imposed upon our youngest generations by the fecklessness and criminality of older generations.
That other ongoing disaster is the destruction of the sovereign democratic nation states of Europe and their diaspora, the result of genocidal policies on abortion and immigration resulting in a collapse in the fertility of the European peoples and their replacement by people of alien race, religion and culture.
How does Greta Thunberg remind us of this other ongoing disaster, which will see Greta's generation of Swedes outnumbered in their own homeland by immigrants and their descendants?
Strangely, indeed, she reminds us of this genocidal catastrophe by virtue of the recent publication of a photograph from the 1890's showing a group of children working a placer mine in the Yukon territory.
Here's Greta:
Here's Greta's lookalike, a child gold miner gold in 1898:
And here's Greta and her lookalike side by side:
Now is that stupid, or just criminal misdirection?
The child in the picture looks like Greta Thunberg who we all know is Swedish. In fact, the lookalike is a dead ringer for Greta Thunberg. Therefore, the lookalike, photographed (not surprisingly by a Swedish photographer), must be of the same race as Greta, which is to say Swedish, or some sub-race of the Swedish people.
But no. Such an acknowledgement that there is such a thing as the Swedish nation, a biological entity designated for destruction through repressed fertility and mass replacement immigration, cannot under the rule of political correctness, which is to say enforced lies, be acknowledged.
So, Greta, you have a valid point about climate change. Your generation will indeed suffer the consequences of any ill effects of climate change more severely than your predecessors. But have a thought for your posterity.
Are there to be no more pretty Swedish girls, no more Greta lookalikes, but only mongrel Swedes, as likely black as white? Surely you think not. So fight on. Fight for an end to fossil fuel combustion, certainly, but fight also for the survival of your own posterity.
Wednesday, November 13, 2019
The New Nazis: Poles Resisting National Self-Genocide
(1) Promote girls' education and encourage intelligent women to chose careers over family.
(2) Make up the population deficit and more through immigration of people of alien race, religion, and culture.
(3) Heavily tax the most able members of the population, including the women the state has indoctrinated to prefer money over motherhood, and use the funds so appropriated to support the reproduction of the welfare class, both indigenous and immigrant.
(4) Compel acceptance of (1) – (3) by means of K to post-graduate education heavily loaded with political correctness, with emphasis on white self-hatred, promotion of every form of perverted — that is, non-reproductive — sex, and contempt for Christianity, the ancient faith of the European peoples.
Objective: the death of the European peoples as racial and cultural entities and the Islamification of Europe.
Now those rotten stinking white, racist, Christian Poles are up in arms against their own genocide:
A thirty-eight million nation in the heart of Europe (i.e., with a population approximately the size of Spain's) has been revolting against the EU establishment and its view of European unity based on cultural and religious indifference and anti-nationalism. Polish President Andrzej Duda asked citizens to unite under "one common homeland, beyond all divisions," but acknowledged that "different ideologies and beliefs" are permitted in Poland. While millions of radical Muslim refugees have poured into France, Germany, Sweden, UK, Italy, and Spain, creating social-economic chaos on the streets of those countries, Poles are attempting to revive their nation through patriotism and traditional Catholic values. Source |
The best idea, surely soon to be implemented by the EU's unelected leaders, is to follow the advice of Professor Christine Fair of Georgetown University in Washington, DC, who, referring to the white male defenders of Supreme Court Justice, Brett Kavanaugh when he faced unsubstantiated allegations of sexual assault during his high school days said:
“[they] deserve miserable deaths while feminists laugh as they take their last gasps. Bonus: we castrate their corpses and feed them to swine? Yes.” Source |
“respect[s] Fair’s right to freedom of speech.” Source |
Catholic Christianity: RIP. Indeed, US of A RIP.
Related:
CanSpeccy: My Plan To Destroy America
Sunday, July 28, 2019
Racist Hungarians Think Their Country Is For Hungarians
Faced with a declining birth rate and an unwilling to fill population shortfalls with immigrants like some of its European neighbors, Hungary has rolled out a seven-point "Family Protection Action Plan" which showers boatloads of cash, loan assistance and tax breaks to couples who agree to crank out lots of Hungarian children. Read more |
So long as the liberal duo of Trudeau and Scheer are firmly in control, anyone mentioning that reproductively challenged* Canadians are replacing themselves with people from elsewhere will be relentlessly castigated as a racist, fascist, Nazi, anti-Semite to be despised by all and sundry as a no-good hateful person.
No, Canadians are firm in their commitment to the idea that men and women are essentially indistinguishable and that a woman's purpose in life is to do a man's job and show that she can do it better than a man, which it must be admitted is often not difficult, and if any man thinks having babies and raising children is important they can damn well impregnate themselves and raise babies without female intervention.
———
* In 1984, Canada's fertility rate fell below the replacement rate of 2.12 children per woman for the first time ever, thanks to the Trudeau Government's non-enforcement of anti-abortion laws, its legislation of no-fault divorce and the liberal climate of the times.
Since 1984 Canada's fertility rate has continued to decline, and is now 25% below the replacement rate. Canada's population continues to grow through immigration, which Trudeau the younger intends to accelerate to a yearly rate of almost one percent of the existing population. Canada, is thus, like all Western nations, with the exception of Hungary, in the process of replacing its population with people from elsewhere: mainly people of an alien race, religion and culture. Combined with a commitment to multiculturalism, this is a policy of European racial and cultural self-genocide.
Tuesday, June 18, 2019
How Liberals Do Genocide
But they were always hated.
Hence the Duke of Wellington’s characterization of the troops he used to win the Battle of Waterloo:
scum of the earth.
Hence the quote from Disraeli’s novel, Sybil, about:
Two nations; between whom there is no intercourse and no sympathy; who are as ignorant of each other’s habits, thoughts, and feelings, as if they were dwellers in different zones, or inhabitants of different planets; who are formed by a different breeding, are fed by a different food, are ordered by different manners, and are not governed by the same laws . . . . THE RICH AND THE POOR.
Hence the motion carried by the Eton College debating society in the 1930’s:
The faces of the poor should be ground,
with the amendment that:
The faces of the poor should be underground.
That was a time of open upper class advocacy of eugenics — by among others, Francis Darwin, Maynard Keynes, Winston Churchill and the Fabian socialists H.G. Welles and George Bernard Shaw, the latter appealing to scientists to develop a "humane" gas for exterminating the unproductive.
Today, the same hatred manifests in a genocidal policy of reproductive suppression and mass replacement immigration (yes they need people to keep the real estate development racket going, the greatest source of wealth in Britain, and other Western nations), but not the hated white lower classes. Any people are considered better than that, even the settler Muslims who openly proclaim that “Europe is the Cancer, Islam is the answer.”
This is how liberals do genocide — in Britain, in France, in Germany, in Canada, and in the US of A.
Related:
The Suicide of Europe
Wednesday, April 24, 2019
Britain Threatened By an Outbreak of Democracy
Initially, with the Reform Act of 1832, the vote was extended to householders who paid a yearly rental of £10. The franchise was then repeatedly further expanded and in 1918, under the Representation of the People Act, it was granted to all adult males, and finally, in 1928, to all women.
During the 19th Century, the extension of the franchise had little impact on the composition of the government, as those newly enfranchised mostly voted deferentially for the aristocrats and their nominees who, in office, ran the country in accordance with the interests of the aristocratic and business elite. Reforms such as those limiting working hours and the employment of children, and providing for universal state-funded elementary education (1870) were seen as beneficial both by the working masses and the more liberal elements among the elite.
Trouble arose, however, from the legalization of trades unions in 1871, as became apparent in the run-up to World War 1 when unions in rail transport and coal mining created an effective labor monopoly that threatened to plunge Britain into civil war. The conflict was postponed, however, by the outbreak of war with Germany, only to be resumed with the inconclusive General Strike of 1926. Thereafter, the conflict continued to undermine British industrial productivity until resolved decisively in favor of the employers by Margaret Thatcher in her war on striking coal miners (1984/85).
Generally, however, throughout the 20th century, the people remained deferential to the ruling class, a class that could claim to be vastly better educated that the common folk and therefore the only class fit to rule. Moreover, the mass media, controlled by millionaire press barons, or in the case of the BBC, the government, provided the public with political narratives that were generally in keeping with the policies of the establishment parties.
But by the end of the 20th Century, something like half of all school leavers were entering post-secondary education, mostly graduating with at least a bachelor's degree, and often a master's or doctoral degree too. This combined with the ease with which the Internet has made it possible for anyone to disseminate their political opinions widely and to challenge the political narratives of the mainstream media has resulted in the emergence of a threat of genuinely popular democracy.
For the first time, the people have opinions on, and interests in, almost every aspect of public policy and loudly demand that their voices be heard and their interests be served. Democratically elected rulers are thus confronted at last by the expectation that they act in accordance with the will of the people. This unprecedented situation has driven the elite to the manipulation, distortion, suppression and outright manufacture of news on a wholly unprecedented scale. Hence 9/11, Saddam's WMD's, "I'll build a wall," and all manner of other lies and hoaxes many of which are incorporated into school books, university texts and Hollywood blockbusters.
How this struggle will work out remains to be seen. But one angle that the elites are evidently determined to pursue is the genocide of the Western nations by a combination of reproductive suppression and mass replacement immigration. In this way, any silly notions about freedom, the rights of man, the rule of law and all that old fashioned crap that brought us to the present pass will be wiped from the minds of men. In their place will be the acceptance of tyranny, corruption and extremes of wealth and poverty such as is the normal experience of those migrating from the Third World to the First.
In the meantime, UK Prime Minister, Thereason May, continues the brave struggle on behalf of the globalist plutocracy to strangle the will of the people on Brexit while what has at least the appearance of left–right collusion among supposed anti-Brexiteers keeps hope alive among those yearning to be free of the EU's globalist clutches.
Friday, April 5, 2019
Here's the Ex-Jailbird, Fiona Onasanya, Whose Vote Blocked Brexit
As the Daily Mail reports:
Onasanya walked through the voting lobby wearing the electronic ankle tag with which she was fitted after being released early from HMP Bronzefield in Surrey.
Her participation ensured that the Bill to change the law so that Britain can’t leave the EU without a ‘deal’ passed by the narrowest of margins, 313 to 312.Onasanya, MP for Peterborough, served just 28 days of a three-month sentence for perverting the course of justice, after repeatedly lying to police to avoid a speeding fine.
If she had been forced to complete her full term she would still have been in prison and, therefore, unable to vote.
Related:
Canspeccy: The Death of British Democracy
Saturday, March 30, 2019
European Genocide for Globalist Hegemony
Wizard of Oz: Greg Clark’s A Farewell to Alms: a Brief Economic History of the World provided convincing evidence that the poor in Britain for several hundred years were outbred by the literate, numerate children of the successful commercial and professional classes and, though not inheriting enough to stop them being, initially, downwardly mobile, they produced the industrial revolution. |
Yes. That's more or less what Adam Smith said.
Unfortunately, the descendants of those who created the industrial revolution are too dumb, ignorant or corrupt to rectify today's clearly dysgenic breeding policy, which encourages welfare-based reproduction while providing every economic impediment to intelligent people achieving even a replacement fertility rate.
The Treason Class rules, which is to say that the object of population policy in Europe, Canada, Australia and New Zealand is to displace Europeans as the majority by suppressing their fertility and at the same time promoting mass immigration of people of alien race, religion and culture. Without racially and culturally defined nations, the sovereign, democratic nation state is no more. In its place will emerge administrative units — each a post-national state as the globalist puppet Justin Trudeau describes Canada, which are subordinate to institutions of global governance under the hidden hand of the Money Power.
The same plan operates in America, cf. : My Plan To Destroy America
|
Friday, February 22, 2019
Evil Russians: Won't Just Die Off Like White People Are Supposed To
Meantime:
Self-Hating Swedish ambassador condemns Hungary for seeking to reverse suicidal collapse in birth-rate.
In a tweet, Annika Strandhall, the Swedish minister for social affairs, said that Hungary’s “alarming” policies were “reeking with the 1930’s”. She suggested the Hungarian prime minister, who seeks to promote the birth of “more true Hungarian” babies was a “right-wing populist trying to obscure the consequences of those policies to the independence women have earned”. |
Wow, those Swedes are real Europhobes. Their policies of national self-destruction are "reeking with early 21st century neo-bolshevism".
Tuesday, February 19, 2019
Stupid Lies About White Genocide from Paul Craig Roberts Brought to You by Ron Unz
White people are on the point of extinction. ... Whites are on the road to extinction ... because of their own tax, social, and immigration policies. ... In Western countries where the white birthrate is collapsing and borders are open to nonwhite immigration, it is only a question of time before whites become a minority in their own country. As the nonwhite immigrants are not being assimilated, Western civilization itself is on the road to extinction. |
Well, OK. So much for the Jewish Holocaust all white people are supposed to feel endlessly guilty about. It was nothing really. It was simply the result of German policy on ethnic minorities being "topsy-turvy."
Whether Paul Craig Roberts has gone senile, or is an agent of disinformation, I don't know. But in any case, his assessment of the genocide of the Europeans is undoubtedly pathetic if it is not deliberate misdirection. Does he, for instance, really think that identity politics spontaneously reared its ugly, white-hating head in Europe and North America? Obviously, identity politics is being foisted on the European people by the leadership, the corporate media, and the state-controlled educational system. To the extent that white people are taken in by the hate-whitey rhetoric, they are merely pathetic dupes of a campaign to make them responsible for their own demise.
Far from being the result of their own actions and beliefs, Europeans peoples are being destroyed as racial and cultural entities because they constitute the most powerful sovereign, democratic, nation states, and hence the greatest obstruction in the way of global governance by the Money Power, which is to say the global banks, and other mega-corporations, and the billionaire entrepreneur class.
Blaming the European peoples of both the New World and the Old for their own destruction is a neat trick if you can get away with it, and is firmly supported by Ron Unz's Silicon Valley Friends, the likes of the"digital gangsters" at Facebook, and Google who demand a constant influx of cheap Asian brains to develop software, rather than incur the expense of promoting good education for all Americans. That Trump is an American-Firster, at least in theory, is of course, why the elite class in America and the World hate him with such virulence.
Sunday, February 17, 2019
Race: Why Liberal Globalists and Communist Revolutionaries Agree There Is No Such Thing
To both classes of revolutionary, the great obstacle to their dream is the nation state that declares the right of the people in any geographic area with the means to defend themselves to rule themselves as they see fit, which means maintaining control of the borders to prevent occupation of the territory by invaders or an uncontrolled flow of immigrants, and the preservation of the religious and cultural tradition of the people.
To the revolutionaries, there is a simple solution to the problem of the nation state and the desire of the vast majority of the people of the world to live among their own kind in accordance with their traditional manners, morals and forms of governance. It is to insist that there is no such thing as the nation, that all humanity is one race, and that it is simply bunk to claim that the English, say, have a privileged status in England, or that the Amerindians of Canada have legal and moral rights to control over their traditional lands and the freedom to live on those lands according to their own beliefs and traditions.
Liberals and Communists are thus in agreement on the need for universal genocide, which is to say the destruction of the nation state and its underlying human biological and cultural diversity. As a cover for this project, which is to be fulfilled through mass migrations, multi-culturalism and the suppression of the fertility of indigenous peoples, both liberals and Communists deny the reality of human racial diversity, for in the absence of such diversity, both the the nation state and the crime of genocide become meaningless concepts.
The war on the concept of race appears now to be heating up with the publication of multiple books on the subject the consequence of which is the creation of ever greater confusion and misunderstanding.
Among the more recent contributions to this great obfuscation is A Troublesome Inheritance, by Nicholas Wade. As a former deputy editor of Nature magazine and a one-time writer for Science magazine and the New York Times, Wade has pretty good credentials as an obfuscator of basic science for political purposes as anyone with long experience of those publications with which Wade has been associated would know, and obfuscation is what Wade provides in this book.
Race, Wade acknowledges, is real, but then proceeds to lay it down as a matter of fact that there are only five human races: black, white, red, and yellow, plus Australian aboriginal. Thus he either deliberately muddies the water or demonstrates that he doesn't know what he is talking about. Making it impossible to know whether Wade is merely confused or is acting as a globalist shill, he never defines the term "race," thus his more or less arbitrary five-fold division of mankind serves to reinforce the popular misconception that race is largely a matter of skin color, whereas in fact skin color is by no means definitive of race. For example, sub-Saharan Africans, Dravidians of the Indian sub-continent, the Australian aborigines, and some Amerindians are all more or less the same color, but they are by no means closely related. Conversely, there are thousands of white Africans (albinos) who are definitely not Caucasians.
Race is a matter of kinship. To define the term formally, a race is an interbreeding population (human, for the purpose of this discussion) more or less completely isolated genetically from other populations by barriers of geography, politics, class, caste, or religion.
Defined thus, we can see that the tribalized people of black Africa are far from being a homogeneous group, but rather, are among the most diverse people on earth and may encompass greater population-level genetic variation than all other human groups combined.
Thus, as Wade notes, since 1980, all Olympic 100 m finalists have been of West African origin. But that does not make all black people fast runners. An East African on the Barak Obama model will never outrun a Jesse Owens over 100 meters, although an African of the latter type will never outrun the fastest East African over ten thousand meters.
But it is not just black Africans who display great diversity. Traveling over any significant area of the populated world one sees regional differences in the physical traits of the indigenous peoples: scull shapes for example, brachycephalics predominantly in North West Spain versus dolicocephalics in Southern Spain, or hair and eye color, to take another example, from dark-haired, brown-eyed Celts over most of the Scottish Highlands, to blond, blue-eyed people of Viking descent in Caithness in the remote North East of Scotland, and other coastal areas of settlement of the British Isles.
So racial differences can be seen at multiple levels. Between a Chinese and and Englishman, or a Glaswegian and an Edinburghian, and indeed between any two places where migration has not obliterated the pattern of genetic variation established during many generations of past reproductive isolation during which genetic drift, selection and random mutation have wrought differences among gene pools.
What these differences really mean, no one knows. Certainly Wade's presumptions about racial differences in psychology and their impact on the historical development of the world seem speculative to the point of absurdity. Yet such differences may indeed be important. Sadly, the globalist revolutionaries are intent on creating a global melting pot that will make all indigenous peoples a disappearing minority in their own homelands and wipe out in a generation or two potentially important racial aggregations of genes created over 100,000 years of human evolution.
Related:
CanSpeccy:
Universal Genocide and the New World Order
CanSpeccy:
Why and How Western Elites Turned Against Their Own People
CanSpeccy:
In Praise of Diversity
Tuesday, January 29, 2019
How Tony Blair Wrecked the EU
How Brexit Burst the West’s Immigration Taboos
The key thing to recognize about the Brexit conflict is that the critical issue is not economics but immigration. Absent the immigration surge initiated by Tony Blair, Britain’s adhesion to the EU would have remained a sideshow among Tories and not the political centerpiece it has become during the last three years. |
Blair increased the number of “economic” visas available and immigration rates soon quadrupled. His multiculturalism had a zealous missionary quality to it, as if Britain was seeking world leadership in a race to negate one’s traditional political culture. It was never especially popular outside of London, but social taboos against racism nonetheless kept it out of the realm of public debate. |
Blair's policy of mass replacement immigration was, in effect, a policy of national genocide. It was, furthermore, totally undemocratic, shown by opinion surveys to have been consistently opposed by a large majority of the population, and opposed even a majority of the immigrant population. Hence Brexit. Hence Blair, the most hated man in Britain.
Related:
Danish Parliament Proposes New Law: Stop Integrating Refugees and Send Them Back Home If It Is Safe